This is intended as a reference article for those wishing to understand the structure of ‘Hong Kong Standards on Auditing ‘ (HKSA), and its supporting documentation. If you are looking for a more general guide to company audits in Hong Kong, you may find this a more suitable article.
Understanding Hong Kong Audit Standards (HKAS): A Comprehensive Guide for eCommerce
Introduction to Hong Kong Audit Standards (HKAS)
The world of eCommerce is dynamic and intricate, creating a pressing need for reliable and stringent audit standards. This is where the Hong Kong Audit Standards (HKAS) come into play. Ranging from HKAS 200, which defines the overall objectives of the independent auditor, to HKAS 710 which deals with comparative information in financial statements, these standards ensure a consistent, quality approach to auditing. The auditor’s responsibilities are explicated in HKAS 210, 220, 230, and 240, which cover the agreement on audit engagements, quality control, audit documentation, and responsibilities relating to fraud, respectively. HKAS 250 and 260 further provide considerations of laws and regulations and communication with governance, facilitating a comprehensive audit process. In terms of planning and risk assessment, HKAS 300, 315, and 320 stands as vital pillars, while HKAS 330, 402, and 450 respond to the assessed risks, service organization considerations, and evaluation of misstatements. HKAS 500 lays the groundwork for gathering audit evidence, and HKAS 570 and 600 lend foresight to the audit process, dealing with going concerns and group financial statement considerations. The reporting aspects are delineated by HKAS 700, 705, and 706, establishing norms for forming opinions, modifying opinions, and emphasizing matters. Together, these HKAS guidelines build a robust, responsive, and reliable framework, tailoring audits for the unique demands of eCommerce enterprises.
Importance of HKAS for eCommerce Businesses
In the rapidly evolving eCommerce landscape, adhering to the Hong Kong Audit Standards (HKAS) is of paramount importance. It starts with HKAS 200 and 210, which set clear objectives and agreements for audit engagements, thus establishing a strong foundation for a transparent audit process. The standards then detail quality control (HKAS 220), audit documentation (HKAS 230), and auditors’ responsibilities related to fraud (HKAS 240), all critical to maintaining financial integrity in eCommerce. Given the complexity of global regulations, HKAS 250’s focus on regulatory compliance and HKAS 260’s guidance on governance communication is vital. Risk assessment, steered by HKAS 300, 315, and 320, along with risk response strategies in HKAS 330, 402, and 450, safeguards against financial misstatements. HKAS 500, concerning audit evidence, is critical for factual verification, while HKAS 570 and 600 offer foresight into going concern assumptions and group financial statements respectively, crucial for financial sustainability. Lastly, reporting standards (HKAS 700, 705, and 706) and comparative financial information standards (HKAS 710) help businesses to communicate their financial status effectively to all stakeholders. In essence, HKAS helps eCommerce businesses create robust, transparent financial systems that can stand up to scrutiny, minimize risk, and promote sustainable growth.
Key Concepts and Terminology in HKAS
Understanding the Hong Kong Audit Standards (HKAS) involves becoming familiar with several key concepts and terminologies. Below is a summary of some of the most vital ones that are associated with each standard:
HKAS 200 – Independent Auditor
A person or entity that performs the audit, maintains objectivity and carries out the task in a professional and ethical manner.
HKAS 210 – Audit Engagement
An agreement between the auditor and the client specifying the scope of the audit, deadlines, and responsibilities of each party.
HKAS 220 – Quality Control
Mechanisms and processes implemented to maintain the quality of the audit, including supervision, review, and continuous improvement.
HKAS 230 – Audit Documentation
Record of audit procedures performed, evidence obtained, and conclusions the auditor arrived at.
HKAS 240 – Fraud
An intentional act to deceive, usually involving financial misrepresentation or misappropriation of assets.
HKAS 250 – Laws and Regulations
Legal obligations and rules that entities must adhere to, which auditors must take into account during the audit.
HKAS 260 – Governance Communication
The process of interacting and sharing information with those charged with governance of the entity.
HKAS 300 – Audit Planning
The process of developing a general strategy and a detailed approach for the expected nature, timing, and extent of the audit.
HKAS 315 – Risk of Material Misstatement
The risk that the financial statements are materially misstated, whether due to fraud or error, which is considered at both the financial statement and assertion levels.
HKAS 320 – Materiality
The threshold or cutoff point after which financial information becomes relevant to the decision-making needs of users.
HKAS 330 – Assessed Risks
The evaluation of the risks of material misstatements in the financial statement.
HKAS 402 – Service Organization
An external organization that provides services to user entities that are part of those entities’ information systems.
HKAS 450 – Misstatements
Inaccuracies or omissions in financial statements can affect the users’ understanding of those financial statements.
HKAS 500 – Audit Evidence
Information used by the auditor in arriving at the conclusions on which the auditor’s opinion is based can be both internal and external.
HKAS 570 – Going Concern
The principle is that the entity will continue its operations in the foreseeable future, usually at least 12 months from the end of the reporting period.
HKAS 600 – Group Financial Statements
The financial statements of more than one entity that are presented together as those of a single economic entity.
HKAS 700 – Audit Report
The document prepared by the auditor summarizing the process, findings, and opinions formed based on the audit.
HKAS 705 – Modified Opinion
A situation where an auditor concludes that an unmodified opinion cannot be expressed due to either material misstatement or inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
HKAS 706 – Emphasis of Matter
Additional information in the auditor’s report that is relevant to the users’ understanding of the audit, financial statements, or the audit report.
HKAS 710 – Comparative Information
Financial information presented for more than one period, allowing the users to identify trends in the financial position and performance over time.
These concepts and terms form the bedrock of HKAS, enabling a comprehensive understanding.
HKAS 200: Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit
Hong Kong audit standard (HKAS) 200 is the cornerstone of the entire auditing process. It lays down the overall objectives of an independent auditor and conducts an audit in accordance with the Hong Kong Standards on Auditing. In the complex eCommerce world, which touches upon various aspects of HKAS, ranging from HKAS 210’s terms of audit engagements to HKAS 710’s comparative financial information, HKAS 200 is the starting point that outlines the key responsibilities. It sets the stage for an auditor’s critical roles: obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement and reporting on the financial statements.
HKAS 200 is designed to guide auditors through a comprehensive process. It dovetails with other standards, such as HKAS 220 on quality control, HKAS 230 on audit documentation, and HKAS 240 on the auditor’s responsibilities relating to fraud. It helps establish a framework for planning an audit (HKAS 300), identifying risks (HKAS 315), setting materiality (HKAS 320), and responding to risks (HKAS 330). The standard also helps auditors navigate the unique considerations presented by service organizations (HKAS 402) and aids in evaluating misstatements identified during an audit (HKAS 450). With the guidance of HKAS 200, auditors are equipped to gather and evaluate audit evidence (HKAS 500), consider subsequent events (HKAS 560), and assess the going concern assumption (HKAS 570). It allows for the successful conduct of group audits (HKAS 600), forming opinions and reporting on financial statements (HKAS 700), modifying opinions when necessary (HKAS 705), and emphasizing matter paragraphs (HKAS 706). By setting the initial direction and overarching objectives, HKAS 200 plays a pivotal role in the effective execution of these various audit standards.
HKAS 210: Agreeing on the Terms of Audit Engagements
Hong Kong Audit Standard (HKAS) 210, which addresses the agreement of terms for audit engagements, forms an integral part of the audit process. Building upon the general objectives outlined in HKAS 200, HKAS 210 sets the stage for the auditor and the client to agree upon terms that would guide subsequent actions such as quality control (HKAS 220), audit documentation (HKAS 230), fraud detection (HKAS 240), and considerations of laws and regulations (HKAS 250). The terms agreed upon under HKAS 210, in effect, lay the groundwork for communication with governance (HKAS 260), planning the audit (HKAS 300), identifying and assessing risks (HKAS 315), setting materiality (HKAS 320), and responding to assessed risks (HKAS 330). Additionally, these terms play a crucial role in audits where a service organization is involved (HKAS 402), misstatements are identified (HKAS 450), and audit evidence needs to be collected (HKAS 500). The terms also indirectly impact the evaluation of subsequent events (HKAS 560), going concern assumptions (HKAS 570), group audits (HKAS 600), forming an opinion and reporting on financial statements (HKAS 700), modifying audit opinions (HKAS 705), emphasizing matter paragraphs (HKAS 706), and comparative financial information (HKAS 710). In essence, HKAS 210 forms the bedrock of the entire audit process, defining the expectations, responsibilities, and procedures that would guide the entire engagement.
HKAS 220: Quality Control for Audit of Financial Statements
Hong Kong Audit Standard (HKAS) 220 provides a crucial framework for quality control in the audit of financial statements. By building upon the overall objectives laid out in HKAS 200 and the agreed-upon terms of audit engagements from HKAS 210, HKAS 220 ensures that a rigorous system is in place to maintain high standards throughout the audit process. It influences all stages, from audit documentation (HKAS 230) and fraud detection (HKAS 240) to the consideration of laws and regulations (HKAS 250) and communication with governance (HKAS 260). HKAS 220’s emphasis on quality control also extends to key audit tasks, such as audit planning (HKAS 300), risk identification (HKAS 315), defining materiality (HKAS 320), and responding to assessed risks (HKAS 330). The impact of HKAS 220’s quality control measures extends even further when dealing with service organizations (HKAS 402), identifying misstatements (HKAS 450), gathering audit evidence (HKAS 500), assessing subsequent events (HKAS 560), evaluating going concern assumptions (HKAS 570), conducting group audits (HKAS 600), forming an opinion and reporting on financial statements (HKAS 700), modifying opinions (HKAS 705), emphasizing matter paragraphs (HKAS 706), and reviewing comparative financial information (HKAS 710). The quality control emphasized in HKAS 220 plays a pivotal role in maintaining the integrity and accuracy of the audit process, reinforcing the value and trust that stakeholders place in the audit and its outcomes.
HKAS 230: Audit Documentation
Hong Kong audit standard (HKAS) 230 revolves around audit documentation, a critical component in the audit process, acting as a bridge between the overall objectives defined in HKAS 200, the terms of engagement from HKAS 210, and the quality control measures outlined in HKAS 220. It is HKAS 230 that provides the structure for documenting the audit procedures performed, the audit evidence obtained, and the conclusions reached. It is intrinsically linked to fraud detection (HKAS 240), compliance with laws and regulations (HKAS 250), communication with governance (HKAS 260), audit planning (HKAS 300), risk assessment (HKAS 315), materiality in planning and performing an audit (HKAS 320), and responses to assessed risks (HKAS 330). In the context of an entity using a service organization (HKAS 402), evaluating misstatements (HKAS 450), and gathering audit evidence (HKAS 500), the importance of robust audit documentation becomes even more apparent. It plays a critical role when considering subsequent events (HKAS 560), going concern assumptions (HKAS 570), audits of group financial statements (HKAS 600), forming an opinion and reporting on financial statements (HKAS 700), modifying opinions (HKAS 705), emphasizing matter paragraphs (HKAS 706), and analyzing comparative financial information (HKAS 710). In short, HKAS 230 ensures the transparency and accountability of the entire auditing process, thereby enhancing its credibility and trustworthiness.
HKAS 240: The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements
The detection of fraud, as outlined in Hong Kong Audit Standard (HKAS) 240, forms a crucial part of the auditor’s responsibilities during an audit of financial statements. Built upon the auditor’s overarching objectives detailed in HKAS 200, the engagement terms agreed in HKAS 210, the quality control practices of HKAS 220, and the audit documentation guidelines set out in HKAS 230, HKAS 240 establishes the auditor’s responsibility to detect material misstatements due to fraud. This responsibility influences and intersects with other aspects of the audit, including the consideration of laws and regulations (HKAS 250), communication with governance (HKAS 260), audit planning (HKAS 300), risk identification (HKAS 315), materiality definitions (HKAS 320), and responses to assessed risks (HKAS 330). HKAS 240 also plays a pivotal role when auditing an entity using a service organization (HKAS 402), evaluating misstatements (HKAS 450), collecting audit evidence (HKAS 500), assessing subsequent events (HKAS 560), considering the going concern assumption (HKAS 570), conducting group audits (HKAS 600), forming an opinion on financial statements (HKAS 700), modifying audit opinions (HKAS 705), emphasizing matter paragraphs (HKAS 706), and analyzing comparative financial information (HKAS 710). By establishing the role of the auditor in fraud detection, HKAS 240 enhances the reliability and credibility of the audit and financial reporting process.
HKAS 250: Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements
Hong Kong audit standard (HKAS) 250 instructs auditors on how to consider the impact of laws and regulations during the audit of financial statements. HKAS 250 builds upon the foundations set by HKAS 200’s overall objectives, HKAS 210’s audit engagement terms, HKAS 220’s quality control, HKAS 230’s audit documentation, and HKAS 240’s guidelines on fraud detection. The consideration of laws and regulations plays an instrumental role in communicating with those charged with governance (HKAS 260), planning an audit (HKAS 300), identifying risks (HKAS 315), deciding on materiality (HKAS 320), and formulating responses to assessed risks (HKAS 330). The guidance in HKAS 250 also applies when considering an entity using a service organization (HKAS 402), evaluating misstatements (HKAS 450), gathering audit evidence (HKAS 500), dealing with subsequent events (HKAS 560), assessing going concern issues (HKAS 570), conducting group audits (HKAS 600), forming an opinion (HKAS 700), modifying the audit opinion (HKAS 705), adding emphasis of matter paragraphs (HKAS 706), and reviewing comparative financial information (HKAS 710). Therefore, the auditor’s careful consideration of laws and regulations as mandated by HKAS 250 is integral to the overall accuracy, integrity, and reliability of the audit process
HKAS 260: Communication with Those Charged with Governance
The Hong Kong audit standard (HKAS) 260 provides the blueprint for effective communication with those charged with governance during the audit process. As an integral part of the audit framework, HKAS 260 interfaces directly with the overall objectives stipulated in HKAS 200, the terms of audit engagements in HKAS 210, the quality control guidelines in HKAS 220, the audit documentation in HKAS 230, and the responsibilities related to fraud in HKAS 240. This standard also interfaces with the consideration of laws and regulations in HKAS 250, forming a cohesive fabric for sound audit practices. Seamless communication established by HKAS 260 impacts subsequent steps in the audit process such as audit planning (HKAS 300), risk identification (HKAS 315), and setting the materiality level (HKAS 320), as well as the auditor’s responses to identified risks (HKAS 330). This level of coordination extends to audit considerations when an entity uses a service organization (HKAS 402), the evaluation of misstatements during the audit (HKAS 450), the procurement of audit evidence (HKAS 500), and the evaluation of subsequent events (HKAS 560). It also informs the going concern assessment (HKAS 570), group audits (HKAS 600), and the formation of audit opinions (HKAS 700), while playing a role in the modification of audit opinions (HKAS 705), emphasis of matter paragraphs (HKAS 706), and the analysis of comparative financial information (HKAS 710). Therefore, HKAS 260 is instrumental in shaping a robust, transparent, and reliable audit process.
HKAS 300: Planning an Audit of Financial Statements
Planning an audit as per Hong Kong Audit Standard (HKAS) 300 is a critical phase that amalgamates various aspects of the audit process. This includes considerations from HKAS 200’s objectives, HKAS 210’s terms of engagement, HKAS 220’s quality control, and HKAS 230’s documentation requirements. Building on these standards, and the responsibilities relating to fraud as outlined in HKAS 240, considerations of laws and regulations (HKAS 250), and communication guidelines in HKAS 260, HKAS 300 provides a roadmap for setting out a detailed and efficient audit plan. In concert with the risk identification process of HKAS 315, the planning stage also defines the benchmarks for materiality in HKAS 320 and guides responses to risk as per HKAS 330. A well-drafted plan under HKAS 300 aids in considering the role of a service organization (HKAS 402), evaluating misstatements (HKAS 450), and procuring audit evidence (HKAS 500). The planning also helps in examining subsequent events (HKAS 560), assessing the going concern (HKAS 570), executing group audits (HKAS 600), forming audit opinions (HKAS 700), modifying those opinions (HKAS 705), emphasizing matter paragraphs (HKAS 706), and analyzing comparative financial information (HKAS 710). Therefore, the implementation of HKAS 300 is fundamental to the success of an audit, setting the tone and direction for the entire engagement.
HKAS 315: Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment
HKAS 315, focusing on identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement through understanding the entity and its environment, forms a critical part of the Hong Kong Audit Standards framework, intricately connected with numerous other standards. The objectives of the independent auditor and conduct of an audit under HKAS 200 are fundamental, with the terms agreed on as per HKAS 210. Quality control for an audit of financial statements, as mandated by HKAS 220, plays an indispensable role in risk assessment, backed by the rigor of audit documentation detailed in HKAS 230. HKAS 240 delineates the auditor’s responsibilities regarding fraud, and HKAS 250 underscores the importance of considering laws and regulations in risk assessment. Communication under HKAS 260 is paramount for risk identification, complemented by the strategies and planning of an audit laid out in HKAS 300. Materiality, defined by HKAS 320, and the auditor’s responses to identified risks, guided by HKAS 330, are inherently intertwined with risk assessment. HKAS 402’s framework for service organizations, the evaluation of misstatements under HKAS 450, and the collection of audit evidence as per HKAS 500 all reinforce HKAS 315’s risk identification and assessment principles. The concept extends into the considerations of subsequent events (HKAS 570), group audits (HKAS 600), formation of audit opinions (HKAS 700), modification of audit opinions (HKAS 705), emphasis of matter paragraphs (HKAS 706), and the treatment of comparative financial information (HKAS 710). Understanding the entity and its environment, as detailed in HKAS 315, underscores the interconnectedness and importance of these standards in the overall audit process.
HKAS 320: Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit
HKAS 320 focuses on the central concept of materiality in planning and performing an audit, emphasizing that materiality should be considered at both the planning stage and when performing the audit, as outlined by HKAS 200 and HKAS 210 respectively. Quality control (HKAS 220) and audit documentation (HKAS 230) provide the foundation for the auditor to ascertain what is material. HKAS 240’s focus on fraud and HKAS 250’s considerations of laws and regulations often factor into materiality assessments. Under HKAS 260, communication with governance is crucial to understand what they consider material. HKAS 300’s emphasis on audit planning and HKAS 315’s identification of risks both hinge on understanding materiality. The responses to assessed risks in HKAS 330, as well as service organization considerations in HKAS 402 and misstatement evaluations in HKAS 450, are guided by materiality. The principles in HKAS 500, 570, 600, 700, 705, 706, and 710, covering audit evidence, subsequent events, group audits, and various aspects of audit opinions and reports, all intrinsically recognize and apply the concept of materiality as outlined in HKAS 320. This standard underlines how essential the principle of materiality is in ensuring the efficacy and reliability of an audit.
What is materiality in auditing?
Materiality refers to the relative size of an amount referred to in the audit. Relatively large amounts are material, while relatively small amounts are immaterial. Materiality is a key accounting principle utilized by accountants and auditors as they create a business’s financial statements. Materiality is a concept that defines how and why certain issues are important for a company or a business sector. A material issue can have a major impact on the financial, reputational, economic, and legal aspects of a company, as well as on the system of internal and external stakeholders of the company so is an important aspect to consider when auditing.
HKAS 330: The Auditor’s Responses to Assessed Risks
HKAS 330 serves as a central tool in the auditor’s kit, providing guidance on the auditor’s responses to assessed risks, building upon the foundational objectives established in HKAS 200 and terms agreed upon under HKAS 210. It ensures that audit quality is maintained (HKAS 220) and supports precise audit documentation (HKAS 230) by guiding the auditor’s responses to the risks of material misstatement they identified and assessed per HKAS 315 and HKAS 320. It adds a layer of defense against potential fraud (HKAS 240), and considers laws and regulations (HKAS 250), emphasizing the importance of open communication with governance (HKAS 260). The planning process guided by HKAS 300 aids in strategizing these responses. The role of service organizations (HKAS 402), evaluation of misstatements (HKAS 450), gathering audit evidence (HKAS 500), managing subsequent events (HKAS 570), group audit (HKAS 600), forming audit opinions (HKAS 700, 705, 706) and comparative information (HKAS 710) all become more effective when the auditor is able to effectively respond to assessed risks under the guidance of HKAS 330.
HKAS 402: Audit Considerations Relating to an Entity Using a Service Organization
HKAS 402 plays a crucial role when an entity uses a service organization, guiding the audit considerations related to these external resources. This aligns with the auditor’s overall objectives outlined in HKAS 200 and supports the terms of audit engagements agreed upon under HKAS 210. This standard also bolsters the quality control for an audit, as per HKAS 220, and aids in creating robust audit documentation, in line with HKAS 230. The standard is crucial in enhancing the auditor’s efforts to identify and address fraud risks (HKAS 240), ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations (HKAS 250), and promoting effective communication with governance bodies (HKAS 260). HKAS 402 aligns with the strategies and methodologies planned under HKAS 300, the identification of risks under HKAS 315, materiality considerations (HKAS 320), and guides responses to the assessed risks (HKAS 330). It also integrates with the evaluation of misstatements (HKAS 450), evidence collection (HKAS 500), the handling of going concern issues (HKAS 570), group audits (HKAS 600), and the formation of audit opinions (HKAS 700, 705, 706) along with considerations for comparative information (HKAS 710).
HKAS 450: Evaluation of Misstatements Identified during an Audit
HKAS 450 pertains to the evaluation of misstatements identified during an audit and the effect of these misstatements on the audit itself and on the financial statements. Following the overall objectives stipulated in HKAS 200 and the engagement terms under HKAS 210, HKAS 450 stands as a control mechanism to maintain audit quality (HKAS 220) and supplement the integrity of audit documentation (HKAS 230). It underlines the auditor’s responsibilities in addressing fraud (HKAS 240), legal, and regulatory considerations (HKAS 250), while fostering clear communication with the entity’s governance (HKAS 260). This standard fits neatly into audit planning (HKAS 300), risk assessment (HKAS 315), and materiality considerations (HKAS 320) while guiding the auditor’s responses to risks (HKAS 330). When entities utilize service organizations, HKAS 402’s principles further amplify HKAS 450’s efficacy. Lastly, the standard dovetails with the auditing principles related to evidence (HKAS 500), going concern (HKAS 570), group audits (HKAS 600), and the formulation and modification of the auditor’s report (HKAS 700, 705, 706), along with the handling of comparative information (HKAS 710).
HKAS 500: Audit Evidence
HKAS 500: Audit Evidence, involves the acquisition of evidence that can substantiate the auditor’s conclusions and ultimately, the audit opinion. As we delve into the terrain of HKAS 500, let’s explore the connections it establishes with the following key terms:
HKAS 200
The overall objective of an audit is fundamentally tied to the auditor’s ability to accumulate persuasive audit evidence as stipulated by HKAS 500.
HKAS 210
HKAS 500 plays a vital role in fulfilling the terms of audit engagements, as the agreed-upon procedures often require the auditor to obtain and document sufficient evidence.
HKAS 220
Quality control measures, including the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence, are one of the core aspects of HKAS 500.
HKAS 230
Documentation of the audit evidence obtained is a prerequisite for compliance with HKAS 230.
HKAS 240
In relation to fraud detection, HKAS 500 underlines the kind of evidence the auditor should look for.
HKAS 250, 260
HKAS 500 guides the evidence collection process when the auditor considers laws and regulations, and when communicating with those charged with governance.
HKAS 300, 315, 320, 330
The audit plan, risk assessment, materiality considerations, and responses to assessed risks are largely based on audit evidence.
HKAS 402, 450
Audit evidence considerations also apply when using a service organization (HKAS 402) and when evaluating misstatements (HKAS 450).
HKAS 570, 600
The evaluation of going concern assumptions (HKAS 570) and considerations for group audits (HKAS 600) also hinges on the audit evidence principles of HKAS 500.
HKAS 700, 705, 706, 710
Finally, the auditor’s report, modifications to the report, and comparative information rely on the audit evidence accumulated and assessed as per HKAS 500.
HKAS 560: Subsequent Events
HKAS 560: subsequent events, elucidates the auditor’s responsibilities in the context of events that transpire after the end of the reporting period but before the audit report is issued. This standard dovetails with several others, notably HKAS 200, setting the overarching audit objectives, and HKAS 210, influencing the terms of audit engagements. HKAS 220’s quality control considerations and HKAS 230’s documentation requirements are also significant. HKAS 240 and HKAS 250 infuse a responsibility for considering fraud and laws, respectively, that may impact subsequent events. The guidance in HKAS 260 about communication with governance bodies, and in HKAS 300, HKAS 315, and HKAS 320 regarding planning, risk assessment, and materiality, are all relevant in dealing with subsequent events. HKAS 330 outlines how auditors should respond to the assessed risks that such events might pose, while HKAS 402, HKAS 450, and HKAS 500 provide guidance on working with service organizations, evaluating misstatements, and gathering audit evidence, respectively. The treatment of subsequent events can impact the assessment of the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern (HKAS 570), as well as considerations in a group audit context (HKAS 600). Finally, how subsequent events are reported may affect the formation of the audit opinion (HKAS 700), modifications to the opinion (HKAS 705), emphasis of matter (HKAS 706), and other information in documents containing audited financial statements (HKAS 710).
HKAS 570: Going Concern
HKAS 570: Going Concern, imparts responsibilities on auditors in the context of an entity’s ability to continue its operations. It is closely interlinked with HKAS 200 and HKAS 210, which shape the general objectives and terms of the audit engagement. The quality control processes dictated by HKAS 220 and audit documentation under HKAS 230 provide support. HKAS 240 and HKAS 250 influence the auditor’s tasks related to fraud and compliance with laws. Communication with those in governance, as stated in HKAS 260, plays a pivotal role when there are going concern issues. The strategic planning of the audit under HKAS 300, identification of risks via HKAS 315, and defining materiality in HKAS 320 are key to assessing the viability of a going concern. HKAS 330 guides responses to identified risks, while considerations for entities using service organizations are under HKAS 402. HKAS 450 and HKAS 500 assist in evaluating misstatements and gathering adequate audit evidence, respectively. The group audit context in HKAS 600, the formation of the audit opinion in HKAS 700, the modifications to the audit opinion in HKAS 705, emphasis of matters in HKAS 706, and the contents of documents containing audited financial statements in HKAS 710, are all influenced by going concern considerations under HKAS 570.
HKAS 600: Special Considerations – Audits of Group Financial Statements (Including the Work of Component Auditors)
HKAS 600, “Special Considerations – Audits of Group Financial Statements (Including the Work of Component Auditors),” brings to light the specific considerations that auditors must bear in mind when executing audits of group financial statements. This encompasses both the overall planning process (HKAS 300) and the evaluation of identified misstatements (HKAS 450). HKAS 600 intersects with HKAS 200 and HKAS 210 as they outline the general objectives of an independent auditor and the agreement of terms for the audit engagement. To ensure an audit of high quality, HKAS 220 offers guidance on quality control, with HKAS 230 elaborating on the documentation process. An auditor’s responsibilities regarding fraud during the audit (HKAS 240), the consideration of laws and regulations (HKAS 250), and communication with those charged with governance (HKAS 260) all play vital roles in a group audit context. The risk assessment process, as defined in HKAS 315 and HKAS 320, provides a roadmap for the application of the auditor’s responses to assessed risks in HKAS 330. Similarly, HKAS 402, HKAS 500, and HKAS 570 help define how to handle situations when an entity uses a service organization, the audit evidence to consider, and the going concern assumption, respectively. Finally, the guidelines provided by HKAS 700, HKAS 705, HKAS 706, and HKAS 710 help shape the formation of the audit opinion, any modifications to it, emphasis of matters, and other information in documents containing audited financial statements.
HKAS 700: Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements
In the context of HKAS 700, “Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements,” the fundamental objectives and broad principles of an independent auditor, as laid out in HKAS 200 and HKAS 210, become deeply pertinent. These standards define the initial audit engagement terms and give a clear direction to the auditor’s responsibilities. Quality control (HKAS 220), audit documentation (HKAS 230), the auditor’s responsibilities regarding fraud (HKAS 240), the consideration of laws and regulations (HKAS 250), and communication with those charged with governance (HKAS 260), all contribute to shaping the auditor’s opinion. The planning process (HKAS 300) and the assessment of risk (HKAS 315, HKAS 320) are integral components to the audit procedure and influence the auditor’s responses to assessed risks (HKAS 330). In situations involving a service organization (HKAS 402), the evaluation of misstatements (HKAS 450), and the collection of audit evidence (HKAS 500), these standard guidelines help inform the final audit opinion. Additionally, the auditor must consider subsequent events (HKAS 560), going concern assumptions (HKAS 570), and group audit considerations (HKAS 600) when forming an opinion. The report on the financial statements, per HKAS 700, is further informed by any modifications (HKAS 705), emphasis of matters (HKAS 706), and other information in documents containing audited financial statements (HKAS 710).
HKAS 705: Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report
As part of the auditor’s report, HKAS 705, “Modifications to the opinion in the independent auditor’s report,” is a critical standard that provides guidance when an auditor’s opinion needs to be modified. It extends from the principles detailed in HKAS 200, the overall objectives of an independent auditor, and HKAS 210, agreeing the terms of audit engagements. With consideration to audit quality (HKAS 220) and proper audit documentation (HKAS 230), this standard outlines the circumstances and the appropriate methodology to revise the auditor’s conclusions as suggested by HKAS 240, HKAS 250, and HKAS 260. Such modifications arise from various elements including audit planning (HKAS 300), risk assessment (HKAS 315, HKAS 320), and the auditor’s responses to identified risks (HKAS 330). The relevance of a service organization (HKAS 402), identified misstatements (HKAS 450), and collected audit evidence (HKAS 500) also play a role. The auditor needs to consider subsequent events (HKAS 560), the going concern (HKAS 570), and potential group financial statements (HKAS 600) when modifying the opinion. Ultimately, this leads back to the formation of the final opinion and the reporting on financial statements (HKAS 700), while other information in documents containing audited financial statements (HKAS 710) and the emphasis of matters (HKAS 706) may also lead to a modified opinion under HKAS 705.
HKAS 706: Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other Matter Paragraphs in the Independent Auditor’s Report
In the field of independent auditing, HKAS 706, “Emphasis of matter paragraphs and other Matter paragraphs in the independent auditor’s report,” establishes guidelines for providing additional clarity or emphasizing significant matters. Derived from the framework set out in HKAS 200 and HKAS 210, and building upon the quality assurance protocols of HKAS 220 and the recording strategies of HKAS 230, this standard underscores key elements without modifying the auditor’s opinion, unlike HKAS 705. HKAS 706 synergizes with other standards such as HKAS 240 and HKAS 250 to detect fraud or consider laws respectively while allowing effective communication with those charged with governance (HKAS 260). The planning (HKAS 300), risk assessments (HKAS 315, HKAS 320), and responses to identified risks (HKAS 330) all contribute to the formation of these paragraphs. The standard is mindful of the role of service organizations (HKAS 402), potential misstatements (HKAS 450), and collection of audit evidence (HKAS 500) in audits. Other factors including subsequent events (HKAS 560), going concern considerations (HKAS 570), and group financial audits (HKAS 600) can necessitate an emphasis on matter or other matter paragraph. Finally, HKAS 706 interconnects with HKAS 700, which guides opinion formation, and HKAS 710, dealing with other information in audited documents.
HKAS 710: Comparative Information – Corresponding Figures and Comparative Financial Statements
HKAS 710, “Comparative information – corresponding figures and comparative financial statements,” is a crucial cornerstone in financial auditing, focusing on the examination of financial data across different periods. Built upon the foundation laid by HKAS 200, it ensures consistent application of auditing standards throughout financial years, while adhering to the engagement agreement terms under HKAS 210. HKAS 710 intertwines with the guidelines from HKAS 220 for maintaining audit quality and relies on the documentation requirements of HKAS 230. The standard plays a vital role in fraud detection (HKAS 240), considering laws and regulations (HKAS 250), and effective communication with governance (HKAS 260). The planning of the audit (HKAS 300), along with risk identification (HKAS 315), materiality assessment (HKAS 320), and formulating responses to these risks (HKAS 330) all underpin the comparative analysis in HKAS 710. The auditor’s work is further guided by the implications of service organizations (HKAS 402), evaluation of misstatements (HKAS 450), and the accumulation of appropriate audit evidence (HKAS 500). Subsequent events (HKAS 560), going concern matters (HKAS 570), and group financial statement audits (HKAS 600) also impact the comparative data analysis. Lastly, HKAS 710 aligns with HKAS 700 in forming an audit opinion, HKAS 705 for opinion modifications, and HKAS 706 for emphasis of matters or other matters in the audit report.
Conclusion: Implementing HKAS for eCommerce Audits in Hong Kong
Implementing hong kong auditing standards (HKAS) for eCommerce audits in Hong Kong requires the astute application of a range of standards. Beginning with the overarching principles of HKAS 200, auditors lay a solid foundation for audit procedures. HKAS 210 dictates terms of engagement, while HKAS 220 maintains the quality of the audit. Documenting these procedures in compliance with HKAS 230, the auditors also factor in the fraud risks specified in HKAS 240 and legal implications discussed in HKAS 250. HKAS 260 guides the crucial communication with those in governance. Planning the audit (HKAS 300), understanding the business environment for risk assessment (HKAS 315), and determining materiality (HKAS 320) are integral for eCommerce auditing, which typically involves high-volume transactions. Auditors then formulate responses to these assessed risks (HKAS 330), consider the role of service organizations (HKAS 402), and evaluate misstatements (HKAS 450). HKAS 500 assists in obtaining sufficient audit evidence, while HKAS 570 evaluates the going concern assumption. For group audits, a common feature of eCommerce businesses, HKAS 600 becomes critical. Finally, auditors form an opinion and report on financial statements as per HKAS 700, modify the opinion if needed per HKAS 705, emphasize or add matters to the audit report following HKAS 706, and compare figures and financial statements using HKAS 710. Through these steps, auditors ensure that eCommerce businesses comply with regulations and offer true financial reflections.
How We Can Help
Here at Reachtop KSHK CPA, we offer the full range of Hong Kong accountancy services including Hong Kong Limited company audits and consultancy. If you would like a quote for us to take over your auditing or accountancy services or would like to speak to one of our qualified accountants and benefit from our free consultation. For more information about our audit services click